Back to Top

Journal Information 

  • Manuscript Submission Site: Authors should submit manuscripts via our online submission system at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aut. Insight Essay authors who would rather not use the online system may email their submission to autisminadulthood@pdx.edu.
  • Editorial Office Contact: kcloudhansen@liebertpub.com 
  • Support Contact: prosupport@liebertpub.com 
  • Journal Model: Hybrid (Open Access Option)
  • Masking: Single Masked (aka "Single Anonymized") Reviewers know the author's identity, author's do not know the reviewers' identities.
  • File formatting requirement stage: On revision. Format neutral on original submission. 
  • Instant Online Option (immediate publication of accepted version): No 
  • Submission Fee: None 
  • Average time to initial decision: 35 days

About the Journal 

Autism in Adulthood is published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers, headquartered in New Rochelle, New York. The founding Editor-in-Chief is Christina Nicolaidis, MD, MPH. The Journal is managed by an academic chief editor, associate editors, and an international editorial board comprised of leading researchers, autistic community leaders, and practitioners focused on autism in adulthood. 

In addition to the traditional, scientific peer-review procedure, all manuscripts submitted to Autism in Adulthood will be reviewed by at least one autistic adult as part of our commitment to inclusion. While in some cases, autistic scientists or scholars may fill both roles, many autistic reviews will be conducted by people outside of academia. Our autistic reviewers greatly contribute to the high standards of the Journal.

Autistic reviewers will be asked to give their opinion about whether the paper addresses high priority topics, the findings can have a true impact on the autistic community, the article is written in a respectful manner, and the community brief is comprehensible to the public.

Please review the Journal's language policies prior to submission.

Manuscript Types and Guidelines 

Original Research Articles 

 Descriptions of rigorously conducted empirical research studies  

  • Structured abstract of no more than 300 words (Headings: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion).  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 6,000-word limit for main text 
  • Main text uses standard heading structure (i.e., Background, Methods, Results, Discussion) 
  • Authors should follow international reporting guidelines as described at https://www.equator-network.org (i.e., CONSORT for randomized trials, STROBE for observational studies, SQUIRE for quality improvement studies, etc.). 
  • Clinical trials registration required, as applicable (see below) 
  • Maximum total of 4 (four) tables and/or figures  

Brief Research Reports 

 Concise, focused reports about original research  

  • Structured abstract of no more than 300 words (Headings: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion).  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 2,500-word limit for main text 
  • Main text uses standard heading structure (i.e., Background, Methods, Results, Discussion) 
  • Authors should follow same reporting guidelines as for Original Research 
  • Maximum total of two (2) figures and/or tables  

Conceptual Analysis 

 Well-supported, in-depth analytic essays advancing theory, practice or policy 

  • Unstructured abstract of no more than 250 words  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 6,000-word limit for main text 
  • Main text may use alternate heading structure, at authors’ discretion 
  • Manuscripts should present a novel idea, develop a new conceptual theory or model, or synthesize the literature in an innovative way  
  • Maximum total of 4 (four) tables and/or figures  

Advances in Methodology 

 Evidence- or practice-based recommendations that advance research methods, processes, or   approaches 

  • Unstructured abstract of no more than 250 words  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 6,000-word limit for main text 
  • Main text may use alternate heading structure, at authors’ discretion 
  • Authors should focus on transferable lessons that may inform how others conduct research on autism in adulthood 
  • Maximum total of 4 (four) tables and/or figures  

Emerging Practices 

 Well-referenced descriptions of innovative programs, interventions, technologies, or practices,   grounded in theory, with lessons learned from their initial implementation or pilot-testing

  • Unstructured abstract of no more than 250 words  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 6,000-word limit for main text 
  • Main Text Structure: Introduction (including why this emerging practice is needed and how the practice is grounded in the literature); Emerging Practice (a clear description of the emerging practice, intervention, technology, or other advancement); Evaluation Methods; Results and Lessons Learned (including evaluation data, observations from practice, and other lessons from initial implementation efforts); Discussion (including conclusions, how this work advances the literature, limitations, implications, and next steps). 
  • Maximum total of 4 (four) tables and/or figures  

Systematic Literature Reviews 

 Systematically conducted literature reviews or scoping reviews, with or without meta-analysis 

  • Structured abstract of no more than 300 words (Headings: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion).   
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 6,000-word limit for main text 
  • Main text uses standard heading structure (i.e., Background, Methods, Results, Discussion) 
  • Authors should follow the guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement (http://www.prisma-statement.org). 
  • Authors should submit include a PRISMA flow diagram as part of the manuscript and submit the PRISMA checklist as supplemental information 
  • Include the systematic review registration number and funding source, as appropriate. 
  • Maximum total of 4 (four) tables and/or figures  
  • Authors should summarize the most important information in tables for the main article and present additional, more detailed information as online supplemental materials. 

Brief Systematic Reviews 

 Brief reports of systematic literature reviews or scoping reviews when the evidence is too scant to   justify a full-length article 

  • Structured abstract of no more than 300 words (Headings: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion).    
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 3,000-word limit for main text 
  • Main text uses standard heading structure (i.e., Background, Methods, Results, Discussion) 
  • Authors should follow the same guidelines as for full-length systematic reviews 
  • Discussion should lay out a research agenda and recommendations to the field. 
  • Maximum total of 2 (two) tables and/or figures  

Narrative or clinical reviews 

 Thorough and balanced reviews of available evidence, melded with expert opinion, where a   systematically conducted review would not be possible or clinically useful 

  • Unstructured abstract of no more than 250 words  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 6000-word limit for main text. 
  • Main text may use alternate heading structure, at authors’ discretion 
  • Maximum total of 4 (four) tables and/or figures  
  • Note: Autism in Adulthood strongly prefers systematically conducted reviews. Authors should clearly justify their choice to use a narrative review format. 

Perspectives 

 Well-referenced opinions or recommendations on topics related to research, practice, or policy 

  • Unstructured abstract of no more than 250 words  
  • Community Brief of no more than 500 words  
  • 4000-word limit for main text 
  • Main text may use alternate heading structure, at authors’ discretion 
  • Authors should be transparent about their own positionality, experience, and expertise. 
  • Perspectives must synthesize and advance the literature in a novel way, through the author(s) own lens(es), not solely review the current state of the science.  
  • All articles must end with one or more sections focused on the authors’ recommendations 
  • Maximum total of 2 (two) tables and/or figures  

Insights 

 Invited personal memoir-like essays from autistic adults or other stakeholders that provide important   insights to the field  

  • No abstract  
  • No Community Brief 
  • 2,000-word limit for main text 
  • The essay should be written for an academic audience and use citations, if appropriate, but it should be in the author’s own voice. The author should use their personal experiences to provide insights to others in the field. 
  • Essays may be in a variety of formats, including, but not limited to first-person narratives, creative non-fiction, poetry, and graphics.   
  • Note: Insight Essay authors work directly with our Insight Essay Editors. If interested in potentially writing an Insight Essay, please contact the editorial office at autisminadulthood@pdx.edu prior to writing the essay.  
  • Do not use the ScholarOne System to submit Insight Essay manuscripts.  

Letters to the Editor 

Letters commenting on the scientific content of an article published in the Journal  

  • No abstract  
  • No Community Brief  
  • 500-word limit for main text 
  • May include one figure OR table  
  • No more than ten (10) citations

Guest Editorials

Solicited by the Editor to discuss a pressing issue or to accompany a manuscript to be published in Autism in Adulthood 

  • No abstract  
  • No Community Brief 
  • 2000 word limit for main text 
  • Maximum of ten (10) references  
  • Please do NOT submit unsolicited editorials.

Reviews of Book, Media, and Other Resources 

Solicited reviews of published works relevant to research on autism in adulthood 

  • No abstract  
  • No Community Brief 
  • 1,000-word limit (or greater at the discretion of the Editors)  
  • Autism in Adulthood does NOT accept unsolicited reviews. 

Word limits do NOT pertain to the abstract, disclosure statements, author contribution statements, funding information, acknowledgments, tables, figure legends, or references. 

File Formatting Policy

For the original submission, AIA will accept manuscripts in any file format (e.g., a single PDF) as long as the files are clear and readable. Similarly, authors may use any standard citation format (e.g., JAMA, APA, Vancouver) for the original submission. 

Original submissions must still meet all content requirements, including any disclosures, IRB or other ethics and consent statements, a Community Brief (in Q&A format), and all relevant information needed to thoroughly review the manuscript. 

The editors generally only request major or minor revisions if they feel there is a strong chance that the manuscript can eventually be published in the journal, assuming that the authors adequately address the concerns raised by the editors and reviewers. If we ask authors to revise and resubmit the manuscript, we will then require them to comply with all guidelines in the Instructions for Authors, including the use of JAMA citation style and the use of documents in Word format. 

Language Policies

Use of active voice and concise language 

Autism in Adulthood recommends the use of the active voice as opposed to the passive voice. Further, we recommend that the actor in a sentence always be explicitly identified for clarity. For example: “A research assistant administered the surveys.” (Not: “Surveys were administered.”) Autism in Adulthood also recommends use of clear, concise language. Avoid using sentences with excessive clauses or unnecessary complexity. 

Anti-ableist language 

Autism in Adulthood strives to use anti-ableist language throughout. See Recommendations for Avoiding Ableist Language for more details. 

Person-first vs. identity-first language 

Autism in Adulthood respects that there are strong arguments and passions on both sides of the debate between the use of person-first language (e.g., “person with autism”) and identity-first language (e.g., “autistic person”) in relation to autism. However, there is a growing body of scientific and community literature documenting the dislike, amongst autistic individuals, of person-first language and its potential for increasing stigma. Based on this literature and the strong preference of the autistic members of the journal’s Editorial Board, we recommend either using identity-first language, or more neutral terms such as "person on the autism spectrum.” 

Subpopulations within the autism spectrum 

Due to the ambiguity and potential offensiveness of terms such as “high functioning” or “low functioning” autism, “Kanner's” autism, or "mild" or "severe" autism, Autism in Adulthood recommends avoiding these terms. Instead, describe subpopulations using the specific characteristic(s) that make them a subpopulation. For example, "autistic people who qualify for developmental disability services," or "autistic people who primarily communicate using speech." 

Terms related to autism diagnoses 

The term “Autism Spectrum Disorder” (ASD) may be used when specifically discussing autism diagnoses. Otherwise, we recommend using terms such as “autism,” “autism spectrum,” “autistic adults,” or “autistic participants.” When referring to historic data, historic diagnoses such as Asperger's syndrome may be used; however, these terms should be considered out of date, and not used as terms for any part of the autism spectrum except when referring to someone’s self-identity. 

Strengths-based vs. deficits-based language 

Autism in Adulthood strongly encourages authors to take a strengths-based approach to writing about autism. Examples include: 

  • Referring to autism as a condition or disability instead of as a disease or illness; 
  • Using neutral terms such as "typically developing" or “non-autistic” rather than "healthy" or “normal;” 
  • Avoiding emotional phrases such as "suffering from autism;" 
  • Referring to “co-occurring” or “secondary” conditions instead of “comorbid” conditions; 
  • Referring to autistic characteristics in a neutral or positive manner, as opposed to as symptoms or deficits (e.g., “autistic traits,” “characteristics of autism,” or “features of autism” instead of “symptoms of autism”; “communication differences” instead of “communication deficits”). 

General guidelines for writing about disability more broadly 

There are many excellent guides to writing about disability more broadly. Authors may refer to resources from the following organizations: 

The Editors of Autism in Adulthood welcome questions by authors regarding language. We understand that language can be a gray area, can vary by geography and culture, and that there are many valid opinions. Contact the Editor for further guidance. 

Abbreviations 

Use only standard abbreviations, which can be found in the AMA’s Manual of Style for Authors and Editors, 10th edition or the Council of Science Editors (CSE) Style Manual, 8th edition. At first usage, spell out terms and provide abbreviations in parentheses. Thereafter, use only the abbreviations. It is not necessary to spell out standard units of measure. Use generic names for drugs if possible. If you wish to use a proprietary drug name the first time it appears, use the generic name followed by the proprietary name, manufacturer, and location in parentheses. 

Community Briefs 

Prepare a community brief, of up to 500 words, highlighting the most important aspects of the manuscript. This summary should be aimed at what the lay public, including autistic adults, family members, practitioners, services providers, and policymakers, would want to know about the manuscript. Please use Plain Language. Plain Language includes the use of short, simple sentences; the active (not passive) voice; and simple vocabulary. Avoid or define technical terms. 

For more information on Plain Language, please see: 

The Community Brief is not just a simplified version of the abstract. Note that the recommended questions do not correspond to the abstract headers. They more closely correspond to the main content of the manuscript. Authors should make sure that they answer the recommended questions fully. The Brief should stand on its own as a complete summary of the most important aspects of the manuscript. Authors should include the Community Brief in the main text file, immediately after the abstract.

Community Briefs should use a question-and-answer format. We recommend the following questions for each article type: 

Original Research and Brief Reports

  • “Why is this an important issue?”
  • “What was the purpose of this study?”
  • “What did the researchers do?”
  • “What were the results of the study?”
  • “What do these findings add to what was already known?”
  • “What are potential weaknesses in the study?”
  • “How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?” 

Emerging Practices

  • “Why was this program developed?”
  • “What does the program do?”
  • “How did the researchers evaluate the new program?”
  • “What were the early findings?”
  • “What were the weaknesses of this project?” 
  • ”What are the next steps?”
  • “How will this work help autistic adults now or in the future?”

Perspectives

  • “Why is this topic important?”
  • “What is the purpose of this article?”
  • “What personal or professional perspectives do the authors bring to this topic?”
  • “What is already known about this topic?”
  • “What do the authors recommend?”
  • “How will these recommendations help autistic adults now or in the future?”

Other article types, including Conceptual Analysis, Advances in Methodology, and Literature Reviews 

  • Authors should choose similar questions, but may tailor them to fit the content of the manuscript. 

 

Clinical Trials Registration  

Autism in Adulthood ascribes to the registration policies of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) that can be found at http://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/faqs/clinical-trials-registration. Appropriate registries (such as http://clinicaltrials.gov) must be accessible to the public at no charge and must be open to all prospective registrants and managed by a not-for-profit organization. There must be a mechanism to ensure the validity of the registration data, and the registry should be electronically searchable. Please include the appropriate Trial Registration Number on the Title Page of the submitted manuscript.  

References 

Autism in Adulthood follows the AMA style. References must be prepared in Word, double spaced, and numbered consecutively as they are cited in the text. Include the reference section as part of the main text file, not as a separate file. References should be cited in the text in numerical order using superscript numbers without parentheses and placed outside of sentence punctuation. References appearing for the first time in tables and figures must be numbered in sequence with those cited in the text where the table or figure is mentioned. Use journal abbreviations as provided by PubMed/Medline. List all authors when there are six or fewer. When there are more than six authors, list the first three, followed by et al. 

If references to personal communications or unpublished data are used, they are not to be in the list of references. They should be referred to in the text in parentheses with the researcher’s name and date: (e.g., AB Jones, personal communication, month and year of communication). Include among the references any articles that have been accepted but have not yet published; identify the name of publication and add "In Press." If the reference has been published online, provide the DOI number in place of the page range. 

At this time, Autism in Adulthood does not yet have an output style in EndNote, but you may use the journal JAMA as a substitute as it follows the same reference style. Go to www.EndNote.com, search for “JAMA” and download the output style.* 

*Note: The Publisher of Autism in Adulthood does not provide technical support for EndNote. If you have questions, click on the Support tab on EndNote’s website for assistance. 

Sample style for references: 

Journal article: 

Raymaker DM, Teo AR, Steckler NA, et al. "Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew": defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood. 2020;2(2):132-143.  

Siew CT, Mazzucchelli TG, Rooney R, Girdler S. A specialist peer mentoring program for university students on the autism spectrum: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180854. 

The preferred citation style for an electronic journal uses a DOI (digital object identifier). The DOI provides a persistent link to the electronic item and is considered to be more stable than a URL. If the DOI is not given on the full text article or in the citation, use a DOI Lookup Tool to locate it or use the format for an electronic article without a DOI. 

Book: 

Wright SD, ed. Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mid and Later Life. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2016. 

Chapter in a book:

Crapnell T, Lau L, Hanks CD, Nicolaidis C, Kuo AA. Autism. In: Pilapil M, DeLaet DE, Kuo AA, Peacock C, Sharma N, eds. Care of Adults with Chronic Childhood Conditions: A Practical Guide. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016:53–65. 

Website: 

National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities (NJC.) History of the National Joint Committee. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. https://www.asha.org/NJC/history Accessed August 27, 2020. 

Conference Proceedings: 

Please follow this structure for Conference Proceeding references, including capitalization and punctuation: 

List all Authors’ (or) Editors’ names (last name first, followed by first and middle initials). Conference title. Date of conference. Location of conference. City of publisher: Publisher; Year of publication. Complete number of pages in proceedings book. 

Preprint: 

Preprints may be cited in the same manner as a journal article. Discretion is recommended as preprints are, by definition, not peer reviewed. 

General Guidelines

All manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (icmje.org). Please consult your specific journal’s requirements for additional information.

All Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. journals follow the standards, guidelines, and best practices set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE; publicationethics.org), the International Committee of Journal Medical Editors (ICJME; www.icmje.org), the World Medical Association (WMA); www.wma.net), and the American Medical Association (www.ama-assn.org).

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. recommends that submissions follow standard relevant reporting guidelines. Please consult The Equator Network for more information.

 

PaperPal Preflight

The Paperpal Preflight service is available for most journals. PaperPal Preflight allows authors to check their Original Research manuscripts for common errors prior to submitting a manuscript for consideration. Please note that this does not guarantee that your paper will pass all submission or other checks, nor that it will be considered for review.

There may be additional requirements for submission. Please review the full instructions for authors for guidelines.

The basic service is free. PaperPal preflight offers an optional fee-based service that will provide a report showing tracked changes and potential modifications. Please note that if this service is used, a clean copy of the manuscript must be uploaded to the submission system.

There is no obligation to use either the free or paid service. No editorial, review, nor any other decisions will be dependent on its use.

All manuscripts must be submitted through the journal’s ScholarOne Manuscripts site. Please refer to the individual journal's instructions for more information and to access the service.

Please check your journal’s requirements for file formatting. Many journals require formatting compliance only on revision; however, unless stated, the file formatting should comply with the following requirements on submission.

Manuscript Files

The main text file, figure legends, and tables should be prepared in Microsoft Word. Some journals may accept LaTex. Please consult your individual journal instructions for guidance.

File Naming

  • All file names should be in English and contain only alphanumeric characters.
  • Do not include spaces, symbols, special characters, dashes, dots, or underscores.
  • Title each file with the type of content contained in the file (e.g., manuscript.doc, tables.doc, FigureLegends.doc, Fig1.tif, SupplementalData.pdf, etc.).

Figures

  • Submission of high resolution .TIFF or .EPS figure files is preferred. Please upload as individual files.
  • Cite figures consecutively in text within parentheses.
  • Images should not reveal the name of a patient or a manufacturer.
  • Note: Figures that will not be reproduced in color must be readable and interpretable in black and white.

Figure Legends

  • A legend should be provided for each supplied figure.
  • All legends should be numbered consecutively. 
  • Figure legends may be included at the end of the main text file or uploaded as a separate, double-spaced Word file.
  • In each legend, provide explanations for any abbreviations or symbols that appear in the figure. 
  • If the figure is taken from a copyrighted publication, permission must be secured by the author(s) and supplied at the time of submission with appropriate credit listed in the legend. Permissions and associated fees are the responsibility of the author.

Tables

  • Tables may be included after the references at the end of the main text file, or uploaded as a single, separate Word file. All tables should be editable.
  • Provide a title for each supplied table. 
  • Cite tables sequentially in text within parentheses.
  • Explain abbreviations used in the body of the table in footnotes using superscript letters, not symbols. 
  • If a table is taken from a copyrighted publication, permission must be secured by the author(s) and supplied at the time of submission with appropriate credit listed in the legend. Permissions and associated fees are the responsibility of the author.

Supplemental Files

  • Supplemental files should be uploaded as individual files. Most text, photo, graphic, and video formats are accepted. Ensure that patient identities are not revealed.
  • Supplemental Information will not be copyedited or typeset; it will be posted online as supplied.
  • For journals that publish accepted versions of papers prior to copyediting and typesetting, supplemental files will not be posted with the paper until after production has been completed.
 

Specific journal requirements will vary, however the general order of elements in each manuscript should be

  • Title page* with full manuscript title, all contributing authors’ names and affiliations, a short running title, a denotation of the corresponding author, and a list of 4-6 keywords/search terms,
  • Abstract,
  • Main text without embedded figures or tables and with appropriate section headings, if applicable. Most research papers should be organized as follows: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions.
  • Acknowledgments,
  • Authorship confirmation/contribution statement (CRediT format is preferred)
  • Author(s’) disclosure  (Conflict of Interest) statement(s), even when not applicable,
  • Funding statement, even when not applicable,
  • References,
  • Tables included in the text or as a separate document,
  • Figure legends at the end of the main text or in a separate Word file,
  • Figures uploaded as individual high-resolution files,
  • Supplemental files uploaded as individual files.

*Double-blinded journals require a separate title page with the title, all contributing authors’ names and affiliations, a denotation of the corresponding author, author acknowledgements, disclosures, and related identifying information.

Your individual journal may require

  • An Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (or waiver) statement and statement of patient consent as a separate paragraph after the methods section,
  • Other relevant ethics attestations (see icmje.org for further guidance),
  • Data sharing statement,
  • Specific abstract and content sections, depending on manuscript type,
  • Word count limits, tables/figure limits, and reference format requirements.

Please note that paragaphs should be no longer than 15 lines once typeset.

Funding

Upon manuscript submission, the submitting agent will have an opportunity to enter funding/grant information. If funding information is entered correctly, the publisher will deposit the funding acknowledgements from the article as part of the standard metadata to Funder Registry. The entered information should include funder names, funder IDs (if available), and associated grant numbers. Special care should be taken when entering this information to ensure total accuracy. Funding information must also be provided within the manuscript.

Government Funded Research / Funder Requirements

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers adheres to national and international funder requirements.

We comply fully with the open access requirements of UKRI, Wellcome, and NIHR. Where required by their funder, authors retain the right to distribute their author accepted manuscript (AAM), such as via an institutional and/or subject repository (e.g. EuropePMC), under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license for release no later than the date of first online publication.?

Other funders, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have specific requirements for depositing the accepted version and/or the article of record version of the author manuscript in a repository after an embargo period. Authors funded by these organizations should follow the self-archiving terms and conditions of these separate agreements based on the policies of the specific funding institutions. If you have questions, please contact us for more information.  

Peer Review

After internal editorial screening for suitability, all manuscript submissions containing original research or that comprise scholarly review are subject to rigorous, independent, external peer review. Editorials, correspondence, news features, and/or Invited opinion or perspective contributions in other sections of the journal are subject to stringent editorial oversight; at need, external, independent review will be arranged to address specialized topics. Final decisions for publication are solely the responsibility of the Editor(s)-in-Chief.

Exclusivity

Manuscripts should be submitted with the understanding that they have neither been published, nor are under consideration for publication elsewhere, in the same form or substantially similar form. Conference abstracts are excluded. If work was presented at a conference, supply the name, date, and location of the meeting as a footnote on the title page of the submission.

Third-party Submissions and Integrity

If a third party is submitting the manuscript, the submitting agent designation must be used, with the identity of the submitting agent disclosed. We reserve the right to reject any manuscript that does not contain this disclosure. The authors are solely responsible for any manuscript submitted on their behalf.

Confidentiality

Editors and reviewers must maintain strict confidentiality of manuscripts during the peer-review process. Sharing a manuscript in whole or in part, outside the scope of what is necessary for assessment, is impermissible prior to an accepted manuscript's official publication date. Reviewers are not permitted to contact authors directly.

Sharing of Materials

Authors must honor any reasonable request for materials, methods, or data necessary to reproduce or validate the research findings during peer review unless it violates the privacy or confidentiality of human research subjects.

Conflicts of Interest by the Editorial Leadership

No member of the Editorial Leadership of a journal (Editor in Chief, Deputy/Associate/Guest Editors or Editorial Board members) is permitted to participate in the review or decision process for submissions where there is a potential or actual competing interest. This includes, but is not limited to research or review papers of their own authorship or co-authorship. In those cases, an independent member of the leadership will have full discretion to manage review and decision on the manuscript.

Plagiarism, Peer Review, and Publication Integrity

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., is committed to maintaining the integrity of the peer-review process by upholding the highest standards for all published articles. All manuscripts are analyzed and evaluated for plagiarism, peer review integrity, and publication integrity. Manuscript screening may be applied at any point in the process, from submission through post-publication. Plagiarized manuscripts or manuscripts with evidence of publication, image, or peer review misconduct will be rejected immediately. If publication misconduct is identified, we reserve the right to rescind acceptance prior to publication.

Authorship

Authorship is defined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in Roles & Responsibilities. Contributors who do not meet all criteria for authorship should not be listed as authors, but they should be acknowledged (with permission from the named parties) in the Acknowledgments section with a description of their contribution to the work.

ORCID IDs

All submitting authors are required to complete their submissions using an ORCID identifier.

Corresponding Authors

One author should be designated as the corresponding author who will be responsible for communication between the authors and the journal editorial office and publisher. This individual will be responsible for ensuring all authors submit copyright forms, coordinating and responding to page proofs, and managing any other necessary contact during the peer review and production processes.

The submission system permits only one author to be identified as the corresponding author of record. However, we recognize that some submissions call for more than one corresponding author to be noted. In such cases, select one author to be the main point of contact for all communications regarding the peer review process of the paper, and on the title page of the manuscript, designate additional co-corresponding authors by including an asterisk after the authors' names in the byline. Include an accompanying footnote on the title page that reads, "*Co-corresponding authors." Please ensure that the title page carries the full affiliation details and email address of any author who should be noted as a corresponding author. If the paper is accepted for publication, the full contact information for all designated co-authors will be listed at the end of the article as per usual journal style.

Authorship Confirmation/Contribution Statement

An authorship contribution statement must be included with the manuscript. We strongly recommend that the authorship contribution statement follow the CRediT Taxonomy guidelines. (https://credit.niso.org/)

  • Conceptualization (Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.)
  • Data curation (Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later re-use.)
  • Formal analysis (Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.)
  • Funding acquisition (Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.)
  • Investigation (Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.)
  • Methodology (Development or design of methodology; creation of models.)
  • Project administration (Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.)
  • Resources (Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.)
  • Software (Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.)
  • Supervision (Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.)
  • Validation (Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.)
  • Visualization (Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.)
  • Writing – original draft (Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).)
  • Writing – review & editing (Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages.)>

Example

Author 1: review and editing (equal). Author 2: Conceptualization (lead); writing – original draft (lead); formal analysis (lead); writing – review and editing (equal). Author 3: Software (lead); writing – review and editing (equal). Author 4: Methodology (lead); writing – review and editing (equal). Author 5: Conceptualization (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review and editing (equal).

Changes in Authorship

Changes in authorship after submission, revision, or acceptance of a paper are generally not permitted, but the editorial leadership recognizes that in rare circumstances, it may be required. The policy for such cases is as follows:

  • A request to alter authorship must be made in writing from the corresponding author to the Editor-in-Chief, with a detailed explanation for the request, the nature of the changes, and the names and affiliations of all authors.
  • Written approval of all authors named on the manuscript, as well as any individual(s) being added to or removed from the author list must be provided. The Publisher can provide a form for this, if needed.
  • Upon receipt of the request and all written approvals of all involved parties, the Editor-in-Chief will consider the request, render a decision, and notify the corresponding author.
  • Post-publication changes or alterations to conference abstracts are prohibited.
  • If authors are added or removed upon revision submission, without accompanying documentation of the request, the manuscript will be unsubmitted.

Name Change Policy

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. supports the implementation of name changes for reasons including (but not limited to) gender identity, changes to marital status, religious conversion, etc.

Please contact the Director of Production and Editorial to confidentially update your record. Identification or documentation is not required, apart from confirmation that the change is on behalf of yourself (requests cannot be made for other individuals).

Updates will be made to the online versions of the article, but without a formal correction notice and without coauthors being notified.

We recommend authors update ScholarOne and ORCID records with any name changes.

Author Disclosure Statements

Upon submission, authors are required to fully disclose any interests, funding or employment that may inappropriately influence or affect the integrity of the submission. Authors should disclose

  • Competing Interests. A competing interest exists when an individual (or the individual's institution) has financial or personal relationships that may inappropriately influence his actions. These competing interests may be potential or actual, financial or other.
  • Personal Financial Interests. Stocks or shares in a company that may gain or lose financially from publication of the article; consulting fees or other remuneration from an organization that may gain or lose financially from publication of the article; patents or patent applications that are owned by or licensed to companies/institutions that may gain or lose value from publication of the article.
  • Funding. Research support by organizations that may gain or lose financially from publication of the article. This support includes salary, equipment, supplies, honoraria, reimbursement or prepayment for attending symposia, and other expenses.
  • Employment. Recent (within the past 5 years), current, or anticipated employment by an organization that may gain or lose financially from publication of the article.
  • Other Competing Interests. Any personal relationship which may inappropriately affect the integrity of the research reported (by an author) or the objectivity of the review of the manuscript (by a reviewer or Editor), for example, competition between investigators, previous disagreements between investigators, or bias in professional judgment.

Affiliations

Authors should identify as their institution(s) the facility where the work was performed and executed. Changes in an author’s affiliation after the work was completed, but prior to the submission or publication of the manuscript should be noted using a superscript asterisk in the author listing and a footnote on the title page indicating “Current Address” and listing the new affiliation. Corrections to affiliations or contact information due to relocation after publication is not permitted.

Permissions

When reproducing copyrighted material such as figures, tables, or excerpted text, the author(s) of the submitted paper must obtain permission from the original publisher or owner of material and submit it concurrently with the manuscript. The figure or table source must be listed in the reference list. With any copyrighted material, include a footnote with proper attribution (e.g. "Reprinted by permission from Jones et al.") and the appropriate reference. All permissions must be supplied at the time of submission. Authors are responsible for any fees that may be incurred by securing permission to reproduce or adapt material from other published sources.

Appropriate use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Published Research

Mary Ann Liebert, publishers, Inc. understands that emerging computing methodologies and tools are critical parts of advancing research. The policies below will be reviewed and updated as technologies, best practices and ethical considerations in AI evolve.

Transparency and Disclosure

Liebert Journals require authors to disclose any use of AI systems in their research and manuscript preparation.

Authors are required to provide descriptions of an AI system’s use in their Materials and Methods section. Include the name and version of the software, the date of the original use, and all relevant prompts, queries or cues that initiated the AI’s response. Potential biases and limitations of the outcomes of AI use should be discussed by the authors when presenting their results.  

Authorship and Contributions

AI systems are not authors and should not be used or named as authors on a manuscript. 

Authorship of a scholarly work requires responsibility for the conduct of the research and the content of the written work created as a result of that research. The contributions of each author should be stated in the paper, noting their specific roles in the research and writing. An AI system used to generate any part of the content must be stated in the Methods section, as above. The listed authors are expected to review a final text and accept responsibility for its accuracy.  

Peer Review

All scholarly works considered for publication undergo thorough and rigorous peer review. Manuscripts with AI-generated content are no exception.  

Reviewers will evaluate the rigor, methodology, and significance of the research, considering the involvement of AI systems. Reviewers should consider the appropriateness of the use of AI tools when they assess the work, along with the authors’ discussion of their use. If any AI tools were used by the Reviewer in the process of preparing their comments, this must be acknowledged to the Editor as part of your report. 

Intellectual Property and Copyright

Ownership and copyright of any work can only be awarded to human authors or human-operated institutions, ensuring compliance with intellectual property laws. 

How to report concerns

Authors and readers who wish to identify concerns with a manuscript either before or after publication should contact the journal's editorial office.

Ethics

Institutional Review Board Approvals/Waivers

When reporting research involving human data, authors must document the procedures followed in securing approvals from the responsible institutional and national review committee(s), along with confirmation that the research was completed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2013

An institution without an Institutional Review Board must arrange for an outside/external IRB to be responsible for initial and continuing review of studies conducted at the non-IRB institution. Such arrangements must be documented in writing in the manuscript. 

If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the institutional review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. Approval by a responsible review committee does not preclude editors from forming their own judgment whether the conduct of the research was appropriate.  Please see https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf for additional information. 

The publisher requires a statement from authors in the Materials and Methods section to confirm that the appropriate ethical approval has been received, that appropriate processes have been followed, and the name of the committee.

Informed consent by patients/participants should always be secured. A statement confirming that informed patient/participant consent was obtained is required in the Materials and Methods section. The statement of IRB review is accepted as covering the review of consent documentation.

If the study is judged exempt from review, a statement from the committee is required in the Materials and Methods section, including, if applicable, documentation of institutionally approved waiver of informed consent.

Ethics of Experimentation

See the following resources for studies involving human fetuses, fetal tissue, embryos, and embryonic cells:

Ethical Treatment of Animals

All peer-reviewed submissions containing animal experiments must comply with local and national regulatory principles and contain a statement in the Materials and Methods section of the main text stating whether national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.

Human Subjects: Patient Consent and Release

If applicable, it is incumbent upon the author(s) to obtain permission to reproduce any identifiable images of patients. Any identifying information should not be published in descriptions or photographs unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or patients’ parent/guardian) gives written informed consent for publication. Informed consent for this purpose requires that an identifiable patient be shown the manuscript to be submitted. Authors should disclose to these patients whether any potential identifiable material might be available via the Internet as well as in print after publication. Nonessential identifying details should be omitted. Informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt that anonymity cannot be maintained. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are de-identified, the manuscript should contain assurances/statements that such changes do not distort scientific meaning.

In keeping with patients' rights of privacy, the Journal does not require the submission of patient consent forms, but instead requires the author(s) to retain and archive all patient consent documentation. Upon submission of a manuscript for review, the authors must make a statement in the cover letter to the Editor/Journal which attests that they have received and archived written patient consent in addition to providing the requisite statement in the manuscript.


Data Sharing

We recommend, but do not require, the sharing and archiving of data and any other artifacts that define and support the results stated in a manuscript in a suitable public repository (in accordance with valid privacy, legal, and ethical guidelines). We recommend that a data availability statement be included in the manuscript in the Methods section or as a separate section at the end of the main text file. Describe the location of the data, details on how it can be accessed and any licensing information. If the data is not publicly available or accessible, that information should also be provided.

Datasets should be cited in the reference list.

Important: Please check with your funding agencies to ensure that are you following their data sharing polices. If your funding agency has additional requirements exceeding our policy, you must follow the requirements of your funder.  

Update: New NIH policies for data management and sharing are in effect as of January 25, 2023. If your research has NIH funding, please refer to the guidelines for new requirements.

Preprint Servers

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., allows for papers that were previously deposited on preprint servers to be submitted to our journals, with the proviso that the author updates any preprint versions with a link to the final published article. All submissions, even those deposited on preprint servers, are subject to peer review and does not guarantee publication in any Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. journal.

The submitting author of a paper which was previously deposited to a preprint server should include a disclosure on the title page of the manuscript indicating the name and website of the server and include the DOI number of the preprint.

Referencing/citing non-peer-reviewed material that is found on any preprint server is generally discouraged by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., journals, but if it is necessary, the citation must indicate that the content is not officially published in a journal, and can only be found on a preprint server.

Special Issues and Themed Issues

Special issues are created at the discretion of the publishing and scholarly leadership of the journal. They are considered integral aspects of the publication and are, therefore, subject to the editorial standards and review policies of all other scholarly content in the journal.

Special issues may be comprised of unsolicited author submissions representing a topic of interest to the journal's community that are curated by the editors and published together.

In other cases, the Editorial and Publishing leadership of the title will select a topic they wish to develop more fully and will create a general call for papers on that topic. Issues of this type may be organized and Edited/Guest Edited by an existing Editorial Board member; alternatively, a qualified guest Editor may be invited by the Editorial Leadership.

A small number of independent proposals for Special issues may be considered. Any proposal will be reviewed by the Editorial and publishing leadership; resulting issue is subject to full review by existing Editorial Board members. We reserve the right to cease development of any special issue if problems with the submitted content or editorial practices are identified.

While respecting the need for editorial independence in the development of a special issues or themed issues, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. takes full responsibility for the content published in the journal.

 

Sanctioned Countries Policy

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., supports a fundamental freedom of expression and considers that the pursuit of academic research around the world from any country should be fairly considered.

Publishing peer-reviewed content, in various forms and mediums, is an international method of communication that drives fields forward, supports the continuance of essential research funding resources, and has the potential to support improved patient outcomes. Censorship, directly or indirectly, plays no part in our considerations of well-conducted and well-presented research and advances in scientific research around the world.

In this same vein, Liebert Editors will continue to remain open to considering research submissions from every country around the world, including sanctioned countries. However, to adhere to OFAC sanctioned policies and to oblige all responsible considerations, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. has enacted the following policy with respect to handling academic research submissions from identified sanctioned countries, institutions, or individuals. The proposed policy will bring us in compliance with COPE guidelines and is similar to policies adopted by other major publishers.  

Below is a detailed approach of how Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. will specifically manage peer-reviewed journal article submissions from OFAC sanctioned countries.

  • All peer-reviewed journals published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. are required to follow United States sanctioned countries laws and regulations. Under our mission as stated above, Liebert journal Editors reserve the right to consider academic contributions from researchers in every country around the world.
  • Liebert Journal Editors will handle any submission from a listed OFAC sanctioned country as they would a non-sanctioned country, ensuring the same level of rigorous peer review and suitability of the research subject matter. At present, the highest submitting sanctioned countries include, and are not limited to, submissions from Iran, Russia, Cuba, and Syria.
  • Manuscripts from sanctioned countries that are submitted to any Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. journal must contain a Confirmation Statement after the Conclusion section of the manuscript which states that each author confirms that their research is supported by an institution that is primarily involved in education or research.
  • As an international company, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. complies with international trade law, which indicates that the publisher is unable to accept payment from individuals and organizations identified and included in the OFAC sanctioned countries list. Additionally, the publisher will not issue invoices or take any payment from authors based in countries where international sanctions are currently in place.
  • Authors from a sanctioned country who submit their research to a Liebert hybrid journal for consideration will be notified of this information upon submission.
  • In accordance with our internal policies, all submitted manuscripts must go through thorough rigorous, independent editorial peer review and adhere to all current and enforced Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., peer review processes, policies, and protocols.>
  • Any accepted papers or content from the sanctioned countries must publish in greyscale. There is no negotiation of this rule. Authors or institutions from sanctioned countries should not be sent any invoices as financial transactions are not permitted.
  • Gold Open Access (OA) journals operate on an article publishing charge (APC) model, whereby, in non-sanctioned circumstances, the author or their institution is sent an invoice to pay an APC when their paper is accepted following thorough peer review. However, because of restrictions imposed upon certain sanctioned countries, Liebert, Inc. is unable to issue invoices or take any payment from authors based in certain countries where international sanctions are currently in place. This means that any submissions from authors in sanctioned countries to Liebert Gold Open Access (OA) journals will be unsubmitted for consideration in other appropriate hybrid Liebert titles.
  • This rule also applies to Open Access requests and orders in general – authors residing in or affiliated with institutions in current sanctioned countries are not permitted to publish Open Access in any of the Liebert journal titles as financial transactions are not permitted
  • When Corresponding Authors have primary affiliations in an OFAC sanctioned country that is also classified as Low Income by the World Bank, the authors may request support of article publishing charges (APCs). The requests from low income authors are considered on a case-by-case basis by the Director of Sales and Author Services.
  • In all circumstances, researchers will receive timely communications to ensure there is no delay in their research progressing through the publishing process, whilst also supporting relevant, appropriate publication choices.

Copyright 

Published manuscripts for non-Open Access journals become the sole property of the Journal and will be copyrighted by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. The author(s) explicitly assign(s) any copyrighted ownership in such manuscript to the Journal unless alternate arrangements are made prior to publication, including CC-BY licensing or if the Journal publishes under an Open Access model.

Upon acceptance, authors will receive a link to sign and complete the copyright transfer form (subject to exceptions listed above). Authors not permitted to release copyright must still return the form acknowledging the statement for not releasing the copyright.

Post Acceptance/Publication

All accepted manuscripts will go through copyediting, typesetting, figure sizing and placement, author proofing, corrections, revisions (from corrected proofs), online-ahead-of-print release, and lastly, issue assignment. Changes or alterations to a submission are not permitted after acceptance but should be addressed in page proofs.

Instant Online Publication (Just Accepted Program)

*Please note that not all Liebert journals are part of the Just Accepted Program. Please review your specific journal's instructions.*

Journals in the Just Accepted program (formerly known as Instant Online) publish all accepted papers within 72 hours of receipt of all authors' signed copyright agreement forms in their unedited, uncorrected format on our Just Accepted platform.

The information that is published online, and in all indexing services, is pulled directly from the data that is populated into the fields in ScholarOne Manuscripts™ – NOT from the main text file – when the paper is originally uploaded to the system for peer review. Consequently, any errors contained in the system will remain on our website and all indexing services, including Medline, until the next revision* of the article is published. As such, it is critical that authors enter all authors’ names correctly into the system at the time of submission. Any omissions or errors will remain on our website and in indexing services until the subsequent online version is published.

*The next revision will take place after the corresponding author reviews page proofs, makes any necessary corrections, and returns the changes to the Publisher. Once the alterations are completed, the revised version will be published on our website, and the newly corrected information will then be released to Medline/PubMed, in addition to any other indexing services in which the Journal is included.

Please note that the typical time between acceptance of a paper and page proof distribution is approximately 3-6 weeks depending on the length and complexity of the paper.

Journals participating in the Just Accepted program do not post any supplemental files/information until post acceptance steps are completed on the submission.

Page Proofs

Page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author as designated in ScholarOne™ when the manuscript was submitted. It is the corresponding author's responsibility to share the page proofs with co-authors, if desired, and to coordinate all authors' corrections into one proof. The Publisher will not accept corrections from multiple authors/sources.

Author Response to the Galley Proof

The corresponding author is responsible for returning corrected galley proofs. Only corrections directly related to errors in typesetting and/or layout will be allowed. Any requested changes related to content, or that alter the outcome of a study, will require the approval of the Editor, and may require further peer review. If the corresponding author does not respond to page proofs, the manuscript may be delayed in the publication schedule, or published as-is, at the discretion of the Editor. If the corresponding author expects to be unavailable during the time the manuscript is in production, the publisher should be provided with an alternate contact. 

Post-Acceptance/Post-Publication Changes/Corrections

In the event an error is discovered after publication of an article, the corresponding author should submit the correction in writing to the Journal Editorial Office for consideration. After Editor approval, alterations will be made to the online version of the article, and if the errors are significant, an official correction statement will be issued.

  • Changes to author affiliations or contact details due to relocation after publication are not permitted.
  • Corrections to meeting abstracts will be made only to the online version. The Journal does not issue formal correction statements to meeting abstracts, regardless of the nature of the correction.
  • Correction Statements/Errata to published articles that require the reproduction of color figure(s) and/or table(s) may incur additional costs to the author(s).
  • Requests for post-publication corrections to funding information will require institutional documentation showing that the funds were to be used for the published work. 

Name Change Policy

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. supports the implementation of name changes for reasons including (but not limited to) gender identity, changes to marital status, religious conversion, etc.

Please contact the Director of Production and Editorial to confidentially update your record. Identification or documentation is not required, apart from confirmation that the change is on behalf of yourself (requests cannot be made for other individuals).

Updates will be made to the online versions of the article, but without a formal correction notice and without coauthors being notified.

We recommend authors update ScholarOne and ORCID records with any name changes.


Reprints

Reprints may be ordered by following the special instructions that will accompany the proofs and should be ordered at the time the corresponding author returns the corrected page proofs to the Publisher. Reprints ordered after the issue is printed will be charged at a substantially higher rate.

Misconduct

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., follows the guidelines and rules regarding scientific misconduct put forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the Office of Research Integrity (ORI).

Scientific misconduct and violation of publishing ethics vary and can be intentionally or unintentionally perpetrated. Some examples of misconduct and violations include, but are not limited to, the following

  • Scientific misconduct: Fabrication, falsification, concealment, deceptive reporting, or misrepresentation of any data constitutes misconduct and/or fraud.
  • Authorship disputes: Deliberate misrepresentation of a scientist's contribution to the published work, or purposefully omitting the contributions of a scientist.
  • Misappropriation of the ideas of others: Improper use of scholarly exchange and activity may constitute fraud. Wholesale appropriation of such material constitutes misconduct.
  • Violation of generally accepted research practices: Serious deviation from accepted practices in proposing or carrying out research, improper manipulation of experiments to obtain biased results, deceptive statistical or analytical manipulations, or improper reporting of results constitutes misconduct and/or fraud.
  • Material failure to comply with legislative and regulatory requirements affecting research: Including but not limited to serious or substantial, repeated, willful violations of applicable local regulations and law involving the use of funds, care of animals, human subjects, investigational drugs, recombinant products, new devices, or radioactive, biologic, or chemical materials constitutes misconduct.
  • Conflict of Interest: Nondisclosure of any direct or indirect conflicts to the Journal, which prevents you from being unbiased, constitutes misconduct.
  • Misrepresentation: Deliberate misrepresentation of qualifications, experience, or research accomplishments to advance a research program, to obtain external funding, or for other professional advancement constitutes misconduct and/or fraud.
  • Plagiarism: Purposely claiming another's work or idea as your own constitutes misconduct and/or fraud.
  • Image Manipulation.
  • Simultaneous Submission: Submitting a paper to more than one publication at the same time constitutes misconduct.
  • Peer Review Fraud: Individuals who knowingly commit peer review fraud or violate the standard accepted practices of peer review will be reported to their institutions. 


Publisher’s Response to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct

The Publisher is committed to helping protect the integrity of the public scientific record by sharing reasonable concerns with authorities who are in the position to conduct an appropriate investigation into any allegation. As such, all allegations of misconduct will be referred to the Editor-In-Chief of the Journal who in turn will review the circumstances, possibly in consultation with Associate Editors and/or members of the Editorial Board. Initial fact-finding will usually include a request to all the involved parties to state their case and explain the circumstances in writing. In questions of research misconduct centering on methods or technical issues, the Editor-In-Chief may confidentially consult experts who are blinded to the identity of the individuals, or an outside expert. The Editor-In-Chief will determine if there is enough reasonable evidence that misconduct possibly occurred. Some instances may require the Editor and/or Publisher to report the instance to the authors’ institution for arbitration and/or investigation. The Editor and Publisher will follow the institutions’ findings for resolution.

When allegations concern conflict between authors, the peer review or publication process for the manuscript in question will cease while the process described herein is researched. In the case of allegations against reviewers or editors, they will be substituted in the review process while the matter is investigated.

Editors or reviewers who are found to have engaged in scientific misconduct will be removed from further association with the Journal and reported to their institution(s).

If an inquiry concludes there is a reasonable possibility of misconduct, the Editor-in-Chief will retract the paper from the Journal and the scientific record. If the paper is still under peer review, the Editor-in-Chief will withdraw the paper from consideration to the Journal. If the inquiry leads to a lengthy investigation, the Journal will issue an interim Expression of Concern which will identify the concern for readers until a resolution is reached.

Every attempt will be made to keep all allegations confidential.

Retractions**

The journal and its publisher are committed to upholding the proper protocols and established standards of peer review. Published papers found to be in violation of the accepted standard principles of peer review and scientific publishing will be officially retracted from the literature. An official retraction notice explaining in full detail the need for a retraction will be published.

**Any fees collected for an article that is subsequently retracted are non-refundable.

Press Embargo

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., permits the use of accepted pre-published manuscripts for the sole purpose of pitching to news organizations under strict embargo, and with the approval of and expressed collaboration with the publisher. A watermarked PDF version of the article (not a Word document or any other editable version) may be shared only with named, personal contacts at trusted news sources upon request. News sources must be informed upon delivery of the PDF that the manuscript is for reference-only purposes and can be used only in preparation of their news coverage of the article. It is strictly prohibited to publicly share, post, or otherwise distribute the PDF in any media format. Upon official publication of the article, news organizations must link directly to the published article on the Publisher’s Journal website. To coordinate publication timing and press efforts, please contact the Director of Marketing.

I40C Compliance

The references for all papers published within the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. journal portfolio are I40C compliant and accessible to all readers.

Archiving and Preservation

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., deposits and archives all publications in Portico for long-term digital preservation. Your article will be easily searchable on Google, Google Scholar, and other search engines.

Publisher Information

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, 140 Huguenot Street, 3rd Floor, New Rochelle, NY 10801; Tel: 914-740-2100; Email: info@liebertpub.com; Website: liebertpub.com

Three versions of the article format versions are referenced in the below policy guidelines:  

  • Original Submission: The article version that is submitted by the author for consideration, before peer review.  
  • Accepted Version: The article version that has been formally accepted after peer review, prior to any typesetting for the journal. This is the version accepted by the editor, before proofs, corrections, and typesetting. Also known as the “raw” accepted version of a manuscript.   
  • Article of Record: This article version is the “version of record” that has been formally copy-edited and typeset and published online epub ahead of print and/or in a journal issue. It is the same version published in the “Online Now” section of the journal website.  

Self-Archiving Policy  

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers offers authors many options and opportunities to self-archive their work. Self-archiving of work is also referred to, or known as, publishing “Green Open Access”.   

Authors can self-archive the original submission version of their article on any website or repository without embargo.   

Additionally, authors can self-archive the accepted version of their article on their personal websites or institutional repositories only without embargo. Any archiving of the accepted version for inclusion in subject-based repositories, such as PubMed Central (PMC), should follow the requirements of the funder of the work.    

We comply fully with the open access requirements of UKRI, Wellcome, and NIHR. Where required by their funder, authors retain the right to distribute their author accepted manuscript (AAM), such as via an institutional and/or subject repository (e.g. EuropePMC), under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license for release no later than the date of first online publication.?

Other funders, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have specific requirements for depositing the accepted version and/or the article of record version of the author manuscript in a repository after an embargo period. Authors funded by these organizations should follow the self-archiving terms and conditions of these separate agreements based on the policies of the specific funding institutions. If you have questions, please contact us for more information.  

Authors are not allowed to publish or self-archive the article of record on any website, social media platform, or repository without permission from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, unless they publish their paper Gold Open Access (OA). Learn more about publishing your work Open Access here.   

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers’ society partners or associated affiliates may set self-archiving policies independently, outside of the below mentioned general policies. Authors should refer to the copyright policy of their chosen journal, which can be found on the Journal Collection Page or by contacting the journal editorial office directly. In addition, specific funding organizations have separate agreements and authors should refer to the policies of those specific funding agencies prior to the submission of their manuscript.   

Original Submission Version

The original submission version of an article is the author's version that has not been peer reviewed.  

 This version may be placed on:  

  • The author's personal website  
  • The author's company or institutional repository or archive  
  • Any not-for-profit subject-based preprint servers or repositories  

Self-archiving of the original submission version is not subject to an embargo period.   

If your submission is formally accepted after peer review in one of our journals, authors must include an acknowledgement of acceptance for publication on all archive sites and, following online publication, authors must include the following notice on the first page:  

This is the original submission version (pre-peer review) of the following article: [full citation], which has now been formally published in final form at [Journal Name] at [link to final article using the DOI]. This original submission version of the article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers’ self-archiving terms and conditions.  

The original submission version posted may never be updated or replaced with the article of record version unless the author chooses to publish their paper OA under any of the Creative Commons Licenses available through the publisher. If you are interested in publishing your work OA, please feel free to review our Open Access policies and Licenses or contact us.

Accepted Version

Authors may only archive the accepted version of their manuscript on their personal and professional websites, and/or the author’s institutional repository or archive. Any archiving of the accepted version for inclusion in subject-based repositories, such as PubMed Central (PMC), should follow the requirements of the funder of the work. This process may impose additional embargo periods.    

  • The accepted version may be placed on:  
  • The author's personal website  
  • The author's company/institutional repository or archive  

 The accepted version posted must include the following notice on the first page:  

This is the accepted version of the following article: [full citation], which has now been formally published in final form at [Journal Name] at [link to final article using the DOI]. This original submission version of the article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers’ self-archiving terms and conditions.  

The accepted version posted may never be updated or replaced with the article of record version unless the author chooses to publish their paper OA under any of the Creative Commons Licenses available through the publisher. If you are interested in publishing your work OA, please feel free to review our Open Access policies and Licenses or contact us.

Article of Record

The article of record version may never be archived on a website, or in a repository or research network, unless published Gold OA under any of the Creative Commons Licenses available through the publisher. If you have questions, please contact us for more information. You can also review our Open Access policies and Licenses.   

Funder Requirements

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. publishers adheres to national and international funder requirements. Various funders, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Wellcome Trust, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), for example, have specific requirements for depositing the accepted version and/or the article of record version of the author manuscript in a repository after an embargo period. Authors funded by these organizations should follow the self-archiving terms and conditions of these separate agreements based on the policies of the specific funding institutions. If you have questions, please contact us or more information.  

Terms and Conditions for Use of All Self-Archived Article Versions  

Authors may use either the original submission version or accepted version in the following ways:  

  • For purposes of your own curriculum or teaching, dissertation, thesis, or book provided that all posted versions include the aforementioned notices, and follow all guidelines and requirements specified. 
  • To share with researchers, research colleagues, provided that such sharing is not for commercial purposes.   

The self-archived submitted and accepted versions may only be used in non-commercial capacities. Individual users may view, print, download, and copy self-archived articles, as well as text and data mine the content conditions for non-commercial and non-promotional research and private study purposes, under the following requirements:  

  • The authors' moral rights are not compromised and there is clear "attribution" of the author(s) in the shared work.  
  • The authors’ integrity remains intact; the work should never be altered in such a way that the author's reputation or integrity may be damaged.  
  • Any reuse complies with the copyright policies of the owner of that content.  
  • Self-archived content may never be re-published verbatim in whole or in part in print or online formats.   

Most (but not all) Liebert journals have updated their reference instructions to follow a standard format. Please note that the new formats may differ from reference examples in previously published papers. 

Templates are available as open-source CSL files and in Zotero, and can be used/imported into most reference managers. 

Please consult your journal's specific instructions to identify the format that your journal will use.   

Millions of papers are published every year. Make yours stand out.

The things that matter to you are the things that matter to us: speed, quality, access, and exposure. We work hand-in-hand with you to rapidly prepare, submit, publish, and disseminate your research to ensure it receives the attention and long-term impact it deserves.
 

Our unique publishing experience delivers:
  • One-on-one expert guidance and communication, from pre-submission inquiries through to post-publication marketing
  • Prompt first editorial decision, with referral options available to other leading journals in our portfolio
  • Rigorous peer review and editorial oversight from leading specialists in your field
  • Zero-embargo green Open Access policy ensures that you comply with funder mandates; you have the option to post the accepted version of your manuscript to your institutional repository or personal website immediately upon publication of the Version of Record
  • Rapid online-first publication ensures your work is available to read, cite, and make an impact as soon as possible
  • All article pages are search engine optimized (SEO) using the latest technologies, making it easy for readers to find and access your work through online searches
  • Immediate deposit of your work to highly visible indexing services upon publication, maximizing your discoverability across all major research platforms
  • Free 30-day access to your published research to share your work among colleagues, social networks, and with anyone who may be interested in your work
  • Availability in library and institutional resource collections in more than 170 countries as well as through Research4Life, which makes your research freely available in developing countries
  • Opportunity for your work to be featured in our highly successful marketing and public relations campaigns that amplify your impact

 

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. has partnered with Editage and Impact Science to provide you with an additional dynamic suite of specialized editorial services to ensure your manuscript has the impact it deserves. Learn more about how we can take your paper to the next level with our pre-submission English Language Editing and English-Language Translation with Editing Services, as well as our post-publication Research Promotion Services – including infographics, video abstracts, plain language summaries, and more.

Visit our Author Services portal now for more information and to get started!

 

All Editage services are fee-based services that authors can opt-into as an added author benefit to amplify the readability, visibility, findability, and shareability of their work.

Publishing Open Access

Open Access enables you to publish your work under a Creative Commons (CC-BY) copyright license in our esteemed hybrid journals. Publishing Open Access makes your article immediately available to read globally, increasing the visibility and potential impact of your research.

Benefits of Publishing Open Access:
  • Maximum visibility: open access articles are freely available online upon publication with no subscription needed
  • Authors retain copyright, allowing broad dissemination of research
  • Articles can be freely shared in repositories and research networks without restrictions
  • Automatic submission to PubMed Central and PMC mirror sites, when applicable*
  • Open access articles are listed with an OA icon in journal tables of content (TOC), TOC email alerts, and in marketing announcements
Choosing Open Access

Once your article has been accepted for publication, you will receive an email with information on how to order open access. An Article Processing Charge (APC) is required to cover the cost of Open Access publication and article processing. Once payment is received your article will be published Open Access.

Copyright and Licensing

Under Open Access, authors retain copyright via a Creative Commons license. Authors may choose between the Creative Commons (CC BY) license and CC BY-Noncommercial (CC BY-NC) license.

  • The CC BY license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
  • The CC BY-NC license permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

*Please note that PubMed Central, not the Publisher, has sole control over when the paper is made live on PMC.

You can find out more about additional publication services, browse our portfolio of fully open access journals, read FAQs, and more on our Liebert Open Access page or by contacting openaccess@liebertpub.com.

 

There are currently no mandatory fees to publish in Autism in Adulthood.

Investment in the long-term impact of your manuscript.

Autism in Adulthood offers a number of optional ways to increase the impact of your published work:

Color Figures: Publishing figures in color ensures the detailed nuances of art, images, charts, and figures are accurately and vividly conveyed to readers. Online publication of color figures is free of charge. To publish color figures in print, a fee of $800 applies and covers an unlimited number of figures.

Open Access: Open Access guarantees the broadest possible discoverability, visibility, and access for your work in perpetuity. When you choose to publish open access with us, you become part of an innovative and vibrant community committed to research quality, transparency, and inclusivity. An Article Processing Charge (APC) of $3,600 applies to publishing open access in this journal. For more information on our open access program, click here.

Post-Publication/Retrospective Open Access: Post-publication/retrospective open access applies a CC BY license to your previously published manuscript. Because this option requires the re-processing and re-deposit of your manuscript to hosting platforms and indexing services, a fee of $1,000 applies in addition to the above-mentioned APC.

Errata: Prior to publication, you will receive two (2) proofs of your article to review for accuracy and to ensure the manuscript meets your expectations. Should you require a correction after approval of the final proof and subsequent publication of your manuscript, you may be assessed a fee of $100/affected page, depending on the nature of the request.

Research Promotion Services: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. has partnered with Editage and Impact Science to provide a dynamic suite of specialized services to ensure your manuscript has the impact it deserves. Click here to learn more about our post-publication Research Promotion Services including infographics, video abstracts, plain language summaries, and more.
 

Any fees collected, or payments associated with a submitted and/or published paper that is subsequently withdrawn and/or retracted for any reason, are non-refundable.

The views, opinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations set forth in any Journal article are solely those of the authors of those articles and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy or position of the Journal, its Publisher, its editorial staff or any affiliated Societies and should not be attributed to any of them.